Airbnb Services Spark Host Backlash Over Fairness

Airbnb’s new “Services” feature promises an upgraded guest experience by allowing travelers to book not just stays and activities, but also add-ons like chefs or massage services directly through the platform. While this may seem like a seamless all-in-one solution for consumers, it has raised concerns among short-term rental hosts who say they are being left out of the value chain. Airbnb is also marketing Services for use in travelers’ hometowns, meaning these add-ons can take place in any home or local venue, further widening its scope beyond just tourism. Hosts, however, argue that these services often happen on their properties without adequate compensation or control. Humphrey Bowles, CEO of Truvi, criticized the move as digital sharecropping, saying Airbnb is profiting from services without sharing revenue or risk with hosts who provide the physical space. Other voices in the industry echoed that sentiment. Annie Sloan, CEO of The Host Co., said hosts feel sidelined, likening the situation to a coffee shop owner being forced to share space with an outside vendor selling goods they don’t profit from. Airbnb has stated that Services are allowed by default unless a host opts out, and the company portrays this as enhancing the guest experience. Critics argue this setup increases wear and tear, adds liability, and leaves hosts managing potential conflicts without any added revenue. Some fear Airbnb’s growing control may limit their ability to offer their own direct services or book independently. Industry consultant Max Starkov said he wouldn’t be comfortable letting outside vendors operate at his property without compensation. Airbnb has emphasized that hosts can opt out of specific services and are protected under its insurance policies, and that service providers must meet licensing and experience standards. Still, many hosts are now exploring alternatives, including direct booking platforms. Recent policy updates that restrict off-platform fees have compounded concerns, with some hosts worried about being de-listed for promoting their own service providers. Bowles and Sloan have both called for changes, including revenue sharing with hosts, a true opt-in system instead of automatic enrollment, and more transparency into how Airbnb’s algorithms promote Services. They argue that hosts, who know their guests best, should help curate these experiences, maintaining the local authenticity that once defined Airbnb. Bowles believes Airbnb is undermining its original value by prioritizing extraction over collaboration. Despite expressing support for innovation, many in the host community believe the rollout of Services lacked consultation and fairness. As Airbnb continues to expand into new verticals, the balance between guest convenience and host equity remains in question. Hosts want to see clearer economics, better communication, and meaningful involvement in decisions that affect their business and property. If Airbnb wants to maintain trust and loyalty among its hosts, many believe it will need to rethink how Services are offered and who truly benefits.

Tags: phocuswire, SyndicEx250629B

Airbnb Services Spark Host Backlash Over Fairness

Related Posts